Rod receptors in the retina of Tupaia belangeri
Anatomy and Embryology, ISSN: 0340-2061, Vol: 167, Issue: 1, Page: 95-102
1983
- 23Citations
- 2Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations23
- Citation Indexes23
- 23
- CrossRef17
- Captures2
- Readers2
Article Description
The retina of Tupaia belangeri was studied by transmission electron microscopy. - Among a vast majority of cones a few typical rods have been found as a distinctly different class of photoreceptors. The outer segments of the rods measure 10 μmx1.5 μm versus 6 μmx2 μm in the cones. The repeating unit of the rod discs is 18 nm versus 22 nm in the cone discs. Rod discs tend to lose their continuity with the ciliary membrane, while cone discs do not. Rods lack the highly specialized giant mitochondria of the cone inner segment of Tupaia. The rods of Tupaia show other distinctive characters of mammalian rods as well. However, the rods of Tupaia are relatively short and do not develop a rod fiber. © 1983 Springer-Verlag.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=0020575040&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/bf00304603; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/6881545; http://link.springer.com/10.1007/BF00304603; http://www.springerlink.com/index/pdf/10.1007/BF00304603; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/bf00304603; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF00304603; http://www.springerlink.com/index/10.1007/BF00304603
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know