The accessory optic system of the rabbit, cat, dog and monkey: a whole-mount HRP study
Anatomy and Embryology, ISSN: 0340-2061, Vol: 177, Issue: 4, Page: 285-295
1988
- 4Citations
- 5Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
The three-dimensional fiber pathways of the accessory optic system in the rabbit, cat, dog and monkey were studied in whole-mounted preparations of the diencephalon and the midbrain, without sectioning, by anterograde labeling of retinal axons with horseradish peroxidase (HRP). HRP histochemical studies on alternate serial coronal sections were also performed. The rabbit accessory optic system exhibited two fasciculi (the inferior fasciculus, and the superior fasciculus consisting of the anterior fibers and the posterior fibers) and three terminal nuclei (the medial terminal nucleus, and the anterior and posterior porcions of the lateral terminal nucleus), but lacked the dorsal terminal nucleus. In the cat and dog, only the posterior fibers of the superior fasciculus were detected. The inferior fasciculus and the anterior fibers of the superior fasciculus were absent. The medial terminal nucleus and the posterior portion of the lateral terminal nucleus were commonly observed in the cat and dog. The cat accessory optic system possessed the dorsal terminal nucleus, and the dog accessory optic system possessed the anterior portion of the lateral terminal nucleus. The monkey (Macaca fuscata) accessory optic system consisted of the posterior fibers of the superior fasciculus, but blacked the inferior fasciculus and the anterior fibers of the superior fasciculus. Most of the posterior fibers terminated in the well-developed posterior portion of the lateral terminal nucleus located on the upper surface of the cerebral peduncle. A small number of posterior fibers projected to the poorly-developed medial terminal nucleus. Based on these findings, species differences in the mammalian accessory optic system were discussed. © 1988 Springer-Verlag.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=0023902920&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/bf00315835; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2451451; http://link.springer.com/10.1007/BF00315835; http://www.springerlink.com/index/pdf/10.1007/BF00315835; http://www.springerlink.com/index/10.1007/BF00315835; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/bf00315835; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF00315835
Springer Nature
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know