Chiasma distribution in Truxaline grasshoppers
Chromosoma, ISSN: 0009-5915, Vol: 22, Issue: 2, Page: 164-191
1967
- 49Citations
- 8Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Similar patterns of chiasma distribution are found within the individual arms of the chromosome complement in four species of Truxaline grasshopper. There is a linear relationship between chiasma frequency and chromosome arm length although the telocentric elements have a consistently higher mean number of chiasmata per unit of arm length. The positions of successive chiasmata can be defined in terms of residual ('r.c.' and 'r.t.') and interference (T) distances which vary in value according to both arm length and chiasma frequency. There is a tendency for one chiasma to lie in a distal position which is accentuated when additional chiasmata form. Supernumerary B chromosomes do not appear to influence the overall control mechanism of chiasma distribution. There is no indication that bivalents within a nucleus compete for chiasmata nor does the chiasma distribution in one arm of the metacentric members influence that in the other. It is suggested that the control of chiasma formation is determined mainly by interference factors. © 1967 Springer-Verlag.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=0013620705&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/bf00326727; http://link.springer.com/10.1007/BF00326727; http://www.springerlink.com/index/pdf/10.1007/BF00326727; http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/BF00326727; http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/BF00326727.pdf; http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF00326727/fulltext.html; http://www.springerlink.com/index/10.1007/BF00326727; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/bf00326727; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF00326727
Springer Nature
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know