Two types of intrinsic muscarinic responses in Xenopus oocytes - I. Differences in latencies and Ca efflux kinetics
Pflügers Archiv European Journal of Physiology, ISSN: 0031-6768, Vol: 417, Issue: 4, Page: 391-397
1990
- 21Citations
- 14Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations21
- Citation Indexes21
- 21
- CrossRef18
- Captures14
- Readers14
- 14
Article Description
Oocytes of 40% of Xenopus laevis frogs respond to acetylcholine (ACh). Oocytes of the majority of responders exhibit the common two-component depolarizing muscarinic response (mean amplitude of the rapid component, 54 nA). Oocytes of approximately 10% of the responders ("variant" donors) exhibit a muscarinic response characterized by a very large transient, rapid current (mean amplitude 1242 nA, reversal potential -33 mV). Responses in oocytes of variant donors exhibit further qualitative differences: pronounced desensitization (absent in oocytes of common donors), characteristic prolonged latency (5.4 vs 0.9 s in oocytes of common donors) and marked inhibition of the response by activators of protein kinase C. Rapid responses in oocytes of variant donors are usually increased by treatment with collagenase, which, in common oocytes, often results in a complete loss of the response that correlates with the loss of muscarinic ligand binding. The number of muscarinic receptors was similar in oocytes of both types of donors (2.2 vs 3.0 fmol/oocyte). Also, the responses of oocytes of variant donors to microinjections of CaCl or inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate were similar to those found in cells of common donors. These findings imply that altered receptor number, calcium stores and/or chloride channel density are not responsible for the variant responses. However, ACh caused an sixteen-fold greater efflux of Ca in oocytes of variant donors (35 vs 2.2% of total label in oocytes of common donors). Hence, the characteristics of the variant response may be related to a more efficient coupling between receptor stimulation and the mobilization of cellular calcium. © 1990 Springer-Verlag.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=0025663849&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/bf00370658; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1964211; http://link.springer.com/10.1007/BF00370658; http://www.springerlink.com/index/pdf/10.1007/BF00370658; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/bf00370658; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF00370658; http://www.springerlink.com/index/10.1007/BF00370658
Springer Nature
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know