Biochemical and immuno- and lectin-histochemical studies of solubility and retention of bone matrix proteins during EDTA demineralization
The Histochemical Journal, ISSN: 0018-2214, Vol: 24, Issue: 2, Page: 78-85
1992
- 9Citations
- 12Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations9
- Citation Indexes9
- CrossRef6
- Captures12
- Readers12
- 12
Article Description
The present study utilized biochemical and immuno-and lectin-histochemical methods to demonstrate solubility and retention of mineral-binding non-collagenous proteins in rat midshaft subperiosteal bone during EDTA demineralization. A monoclonal antibody (9-A-2) specific for chondroitin 4-sulphate and dermatan sulphate and wheat germ agglutinin (WGA) specific for N-acetyl-d-glucosamine, N-acetylneuraminic acid, and N-acetyl-d-galactosamine were used. Bone proteins were extracted from fresh unfixed or aldehyde-fixed specimens with a three step extraction procedure, 4 M guanidine HCl (GdnCl), aqueous EDTA without GdnCl, followed by GdnCl. For comparison with the second extraction step, ethanolic trimethylammonium EDTA (ethanolic EDTA) was substituted for aqueous EDTA. Based on protein staining and Western blot analysis of SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis of each extract using 9-A-2 and WGA, retention of mineral-binding proteins extractable from fresh specimens with aqueous EDTA was greatly increased in tissue when ethanolic EDTA was used. Their retention was even greater with prior aldehyde fixation. Maximum retention with no detectable solubility of 9-A-2 and WGA reactive proteins was obtained after ethanolic EDTA extraction of aldehyde-fixed specimens, which concomitantly provided the strongest immuno- and lectin staining. These results indicate that this combined method dramatically improves retention of PGs and glycoproteins during demineralization of bone tissues and provides the best method for localizing these glycoconjugates. © 1992 Chapman & Hall.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=0026531344&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/bf01082443; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1577625; http://link.springer.com/10.1007/BF01082443; http://www.springerlink.com/index/pdf/10.1007/BF01082443; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/bf01082443; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF01082443; http://www.springerlink.com/index/10.1007/BF01082443
Springer Nature
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know