Systematic follow-up: A concept for evaluation of operative results in duodenal ulcer patients
Klinische Wochenschrift, ISSN: 0023-2173, Vol: 55, Issue: 19, Page: 925-932
1977
- 22Citations
- 1Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations22
- Citation Indexes22
- CrossRef22
- 15
- Captures1
- Readers1
Review Description
For patients with chronic duodenal ulcer a systematic follow-up concept has been developed in several medical centers. Defined attributes and parameters are assessed in each of the patients before, and at several intervals after, operation. The necessity of such a follow-up can be defended on several grounds and by its organisational structure it can be differentiated from a simple and irregular medical check-up after operation. It provides a more rational basis for treating a patient than the "experience" made up by impressions. The question of logistics in such a gastric follow-up contains many subquestions which may be answered differently in different locations but have still to be tested by controlled clinical trials. All these considerations however have the common aim to assess clinical data more reliably and with less personal bias than before. A concept for the evaluation of operative results in duodenal ulcer patients as has been started in Marburg is presented. Findings are obtained by a series of standardized interviews and examinations. Diagnoses, indications for operation and results of operation are established by a final decision made by a panel. A role for a theoretical surgeon in the follow-up is proposed. The possibility of performing a gastric follow-up is advocated both for University and district hospitals. © 1977 Springer-Verlag.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=0017624888&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/bf01479224; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/926706; http://link.springer.com/10.1007/BF01479224; http://www.springerlink.com/index/pdf/10.1007/BF01479224; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/bf01479224; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF01479224; http://www.springerlink.com/index/10.1007/BF01479224
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know