Different metabolic responses to exercise training programmes in single rat muscle fibres
Journal of Muscle Research and Cell Motility, ISSN: 0142-4319, Vol: 11, Issue: 2, Page: 105-113
1990
- 19Citations
- 12Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations19
- Citation Indexes19
- 19
- CrossRef16
- Captures12
- Readers12
- 12
Article Description
The aim of this report is to elucidate the effects of exercise training on metabolic properties of different muscle fibre types of the rat hindlimb. Single muscle fibres were dissected from soleus (SOL) or extensor digitorum longus (EDL) muscles of Wistar strain male rats trained on a treadmill for 16 weeks. Each fibre was typed histochemically (SO, slow-twitch oxidative; FOG, fast-twitch oxidative glycolytic; FG, fast-twitch glycolytic). Then glycolytic and oxidative enzymes (CK, LDH, PFK, PK, SDH, and MDH) activities were measured biochemically. Slow,-type fibres (SO) were hypertrophied following endurance training and fast-twitch fibres (FOG and FG) were hypertrophied following sprint training. In EDL muscles the distribution of the slow-type fibres was reduced following the sprint training. The activity of glycolytic enzymes increased significantly in the fast-type fibres (FOG and FG) following sprint training, while oxidative enzymes activities increased in both fast (FOG and FG) and slow (SO) muscle fibres following the endurance training. Neither glycolytic nor oxidative enzymes' activities always increased equally in all types of fibre following exercise training. Consequently, the metabolic profiles in each type of single muscle fibre were affected differently by different intensities of exercise training. These results suggest that the functional (enzymes activity) and structural (muscle fibre hypertrophy) changes of skeletal muscle fibre following exercise training appeared gradually, and would be controlled by different factors. © 1990 Chapman and Hall Ltd.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=0025276820&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/bf01766489; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2351748; http://link.springer.com/10.1007/BF01766489; http://www.springerlink.com/index/pdf/10.1007/BF01766489; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/bf01766489; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF01766489; http://www.springerlink.com/index/10.1007/BF01766489
Springer Nature
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know