Effect of glass ceramic and titanium implants on primary calcification during rat tibial bone healing
Calcified Tissue International, ISSN: 0171-967X, Vol: 49, Issue: 5, Page: 359-364
1991
- 29Citations
- 12Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations29
- Citation Indexes29
- 29
- CrossRef21
- Captures12
- Readers12
- 12
Article Description
The effect of bone bonding (KG Cera, Mina 13, and titanium) and nonbone bonding (KGy-213, M 8/1) implants on primary calcification in endosteal bone was examined by comparing changes in the morphometry of matrix vesicles to those occurring during normal bone healing following ablation of rat tibial marrow. The concentration of matrix vesicles, their diameter, and their distance from the calcification front were determined using computerized cytomorphometry at the transmission electron microscopic level. The results demonstrated that bone bonding materials supported an increase in matrix vesicle concentration when compared with control bone at 6 and 14 days postimplantation. At 14 days, there were fewer matrix vesicles in the bone adjacent to the nonbonding implants. Though matrix vesicle diameter decreased in the control bone between 6 and 14 days, it increased in all of the experimental samples. Diameters were significantly greater in the bone bonding samples at 14 days and significantly lower in the nonbonding samples at 6 days. Distance from the calcification front decreased between 6 and 14 days in all groups except in bone adjacent to the KGy-213 implants. In bone adjacent to the bone bonding implants, distance from the calcification front was comparable to or further than that of control bone; in the nonbonding samples it was closer to the calcification front. These results demonstrate that production and maturation of matrix vesicles is influenced in a differential manner by the presence of implant materials. © 1991 Springer-Verlag New York Inc.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=0026314911&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/bf02556260; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1782576; http://link.springer.com/10.1007/BF02556260; http://www.springerlink.com/index/pdf/10.1007/BF02556260; http://www.springerlink.com/index/10.1007/BF02556260; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/bf02556260; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF02556260
Springer Nature
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know