Changes in Phragmites australis in South-Eastern Australia: A habitat assessment
Folia Geobotanica, ISSN: 1211-9520, Vol: 35, Issue: 4, Page: 353-362
2000
- 25Citations
- 23Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
The status of common reed (Phragmites australis) in south-eastern Australia was assessed by considering its physical habitat. Phragmites habitats were categorized into three types-wetland, riverine and estuarine and all three showed negative change (loss, degradation) since European settlement. However, there were also instances of positive (new, re-establishment) changes. Integrating these negative and positive changes at the catchment scale for the Murrumbidgee River, suggest a re-distribution of Phragmites is occuring, and this may be true for other rivers managed for irrigation. Agriculture appears to be the principal cause of Phragmites australis losses in eastern Australia. There is no evidence to date of reed decline in Australia like that in parts of Europe, nor of expansion as in the coastal wetlands of the United States of America. The habitat approach used here was qualitative but this was necessary due to the lack of historical data on Phragmites and to the limited number of case studies. However, quantitative studies are needed, in order to understand how river health and aquatic biodiversity are being affected.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=0034488346&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/bf02803548; http://link.springer.com/10.1007/BF02803548; http://www.springerlink.com/index/pdf/10.1007/BF02803548; http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/BF02803548; http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/BF02803548.pdf; http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF02803548/fulltext.html; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/bf02803548; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF02803548; http://www.springerlink.com/index/10.1007/BF02803548
Springer Nature
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know