Morphological and ploidy level variation of Centaurea phrygia agg. (Asteraceae) in the Czech Republic, Slovakia and Ukraine
Folia Geobotanica, ISSN: 1211-9520, Vol: 42, Issue: 1, Page: 77-102
2007
- 41Citations
- 20Captures
- 1Mentions
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Centaurea phrygia agg. was studied in part of Central Europe (Czech Republic, Slovakia and Ukraine) to evaluate its karyological and morphological variation. Three ploidy levels were found: diploid (C. pseudophrygia, C. stenolepis and several populations of C. phrygia s.str.), tetraploid (C. oxylepis and several populations of C, phrygia s.str.), and triploid (very rare, only single individuals). Only one taxon, C. phrygia s.str., comprises populations of two ploidy levels, but they seem to be geographically separated. Multivariate morphometric analysis confirmed the separation of the four taxa; the length and the width of appendages of middle involucral bracts, visibility of appendages of inner involucral bracts, the length and the width of an involucre, and the length/width ratio of middle cauline leaves are the most important discriminant characters. Several populations intermediate between two species (either C. pseudophrygia and C. stenolepis or C. oxylepis and C. phrygia s.str.) were found. Their possible origin from introgressive hybridization is discussed considering their morphology (intermediate between putative parental species), chromosome numbers (always the same as in putative parents), and distribution (both spatially and ecologically more or less intermediate between distribution ranges of putative parents). A determination key for the four studied species, including intermediates, is also presented.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=33846946848&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/bf02835103; http://link.springer.com/10.1007/BF02835103; http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/BF02835103; http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/BF02835103.pdf; http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF02835103/fulltext.html; http://www.springerlink.com/index/pdf/10.1007/BF02835103; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/bf02835103; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF02835103; http://www.springerlink.com/index/10.1007/BF02835103
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know