The management of functional mitral regurgitation
Current Cardiology Reports, ISSN: 1523-3782, Vol: 9, Issue: 2, Page: 112-117
2007
- 10Citations
- 2Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations10
- Citation Indexes10
- 10
- CrossRef9
- Captures2
- Readers2
Review Description
Mitral regurgitation (MR) may be classified into two major categories: primary and secondary (functional). In primary MR, disease of the valve itself (eg, myxomatous degeneration, rheumatic disease) causes valve incompetence, producing left ventricular (LV) volume overload. To compensate, the left ventricle must enlarge in order to increase its volume-pumping capacity. If volume overload is prolonged and severe, the adverse effects of remodeling together with activation of deleterious neurohumoral systems leads to myocardial damage. it is quite clear that correction of the volume overload causes myocardial healing and reverse remodeling. Conversely, in secondary MR, the valve itself is normal. Ventricular dilatation and wall motion abnormalities cause papillary muscle displacement and annular dilatation, causing a normal mitral valve to leak. In this situation it is not clear whether or when correction of the MR is beneficial because the MR was not the primary cause of the LV dysfunction to begin with. Other areas of uncertainty include the type of correction to be used and whether burgeoning technologies for percutaneous valve repair will be useful. Copyright © 2007 by Current Medicine Group LLC.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=34247560145&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/bf02938337; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17430678; http://link.springer.com/10.1007/BF02938337; http://www.springerlink.com/index/pdf/10.1007/BF02938337; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/bf02938337; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF02938337; http://www.springerlink.com/index/10.1007/BF02938337
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know