Correlation of allelic loss with poor postoperative survival in breast cancer
Breast Cancer, ISSN: 1340-6868, Vol: 6, Issue: 4, Page: 351-356
1999
- 8Citations
- 1Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations8
- Citation Indexes8
- CrossRef3
- Captures1
- Readers1
Review Description
Background: Allelic losses of tumor suppressor genes or the chromosomal regions harboring them in the DNA of tumor cells may become useful postoperative prognostic indicators. Methods: To examine whether specific allelic losses correlate with postoperative survival in a fiveyear prospective follow-up, we tested tumors from a cohort of 504 breast cancer patients for allelic loss of 1 8 microsatellite markers representing either known tumor suppressor genes or regions where genetic alterations are frequent in breast tumors. Results: Patients with allelic loss at 1 p34, 3p25, 8p22, 13q12, 17pl 3.3, or 17q21.1 had a significantly higher risks of postoperative mortality compared with those whose tumors retained both alleles at those loci (at lp34, the 5-year mortality rate was 23% among patients with loss vs 10% with retention, ρ = 0.0100; at 3p25, 22% vs 9%, ρ = 0.0014; at 8p22, 24% vs 7%, ρ = 0.0177; at 13q12, 19% vs 8%, ρ = 0.0093; at 17pl3.3, 19% vs 9%, ρ = 0.0078; and at 1 Zq 21.1, 17% vs 10%, ρ = 0.0475). Conclusion: Allelic losses at these loci can serve as negative prognostic indicators to guide postoperative management, especially in the selection of those who will benefit from intensive adjuvant therapies.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84863229202&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/bf02966452; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11091742; http://link.springer.com/10.1007/BF02966452; http://www.springerlink.com/index/pdf/10.1007/BF02966452; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/bf02966452; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF02966452; http://www.springerlink.com/index/10.1007/BF02966452
Springer Nature
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know