PlumX Metrics
Embed PlumX Metrics

The distinction between positive and negative reinforcement: Use with care

Behavior Analyst, ISSN: 0738-6729, Vol: 29, Issue: 1, Page: 141-151
2006
  • 17
    Citations
  • 0
    Usage
  • 86
    Captures
  • 1
    Mentions
  • 38
    Social Media
Metric Options:   Counts1 Year3 Year

Metrics Details

  • Citations
    17
  • Captures
    86
  • Mentions
    1
    • News Mentions
      1
      • News
        1
  • Social Media
    38
    • Shares, Likes & Comments
      38
      • Facebook
        38

Most Recent News

10 Tips For Training Your New Dog

Welcoming a new dog into your home is an exciting and rewarding experience. However, it comes with the responsibility of training your furry friend to

Review Description

It is customary in behavior analysis to distinguish between positive and negative reinforcement in terms of whether the reinforcing event involves onset or offset of a stimulus. In a previous article (Baron & Galizio, 2005), we concluded that a distinction of these terms is not only ambiguous but has little if any functional significance. Here, we respond to commentaries by a group of distinguished behavior analysts about the issues we raised. Although several of the commentators argued for preservation of the distinction, we remain unconvinced that its benefits outweigh its weaknesses. Because this distinction is so deeply embedded in the language of behavior analysis, we hardly expect that it will be abandoned. However, we hope that the terms positive and negative reinforcement will be used with circumspection and with full knowledge of the confusion they can engender.

Provide Feedback

Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know