Cross-species coprophagy in small stream detritivores counteracts low-quality litter: native versus invasive plant litter
Aquatic Sciences, ISSN: 1420-9055, Vol: 85, Issue: 1
2023
- 2Citations
- 17Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Understanding how stream detritivores can cope with riparian plant invasions is relevant to predict future impacts on detritivore assemblages and the functioning of small stream ecosystems, where litter decomposition mainly fuels food webs. In a microcosm feeding trial, we examined survival, consumption, growth, and energetic status of two detritivores coexisting in nature: the amphipod Echinogammarus obtusidens, and the snail Melanopsis praemorsa. Detritivores were fed two types of leaf litter—the native tree Populus alba, and the invasive reed Arundo donax—and the corresponding con- and heterospecifics faeces produced from the ingestion of the litter from these species. We aimed to assess whether lowland stream detritivores can use coprophagy as a suitable feeding strategy alternatively to Arundo litter; and how coprophagy affects their fitness compared to litter from native and non-native plants. Echinogammarus presented the highest performance when fed Melanopsis’ faeces but the lowest when fed leaf litter, especially the invasive one, exhibiting a high mortality rate. Melanopsis exhibited good and similar performance when fed on both leaf litter species, as well as on conspecific faeces. Echinogammarus performed best as cross-species coprophagous, enabling the amphipods to thrive on the low-quality litter species offered when Melanopsis was present. These results suggest that Echinogammarus obtusidens may act as a coprophagous when no high-quality litter is available. Thus, the snail seems to play a key role facilitating the access to nutrients of recalcitrant leaf litter to sympatric detritivore species via coprophagy.
Bibliographic Details
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know