A comparative study of the recent most potent small-molecule PD-L1 inhibitors: what can we learn?
Medicinal Chemistry Research, ISSN: 1554-8120, Vol: 30, Issue: 6, Page: 1230-1239
2021
- 1Citations
- 14Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Immune checkpoint inhibitors targeting the PD-1/PD-L1 pathway have become a “game-changer” in the cancer treatment. However, none of the small molecular inhibitors has been approved yet. To explore the advantages and disadvantages of various scaffolds, different biological evaluations were performed on the three selected small inhibitors, namely Incyte-001, Incyte-011, and BMS-1001. In the HTRF assay, BMS-1001 showed the best binding activity for PD-L1 (IC = 0.9 nM) while Incyte-011 (IC = 5.293 nM) was twice more potent than the Incyte-001 (IC = 11 nM). Also, only Incyte-011 increased the IFN-γ production. Notably, the Incyte-001 exhibited the highest cytotoxicity (EC = 1.635 μM). Interestingly, Incyte-001 (injected intravenously 2 mg/kg) also displayed good blood-brain barrier permeability and reached a high concentration in the brain tissue. Finally, molecular docking and modeling studies suggested that the compounds bind in a pocket at the interface of two PD-L1 monomers. Overall, our work shows that PD-1/PD-L1 small molecular inhibitors have different biological characteristics depending on their unique skeletons, which can be further improved to better their clinical application. [Figure not available: see fulltext.]
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85104501345&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00044-021-02728-3; https://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00044-021-02728-3; https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00044-021-02728-3.pdf; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00044-021-02728-3/fulltext.html; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00044-021-02728-3; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00044-021-02728-3
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know