Selected legal aspects of end-of-life care: Euthanasia, palliative sedation and emergency medicine
Medizinische Klinik - Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin, ISSN: 2193-6226, Vol: 118, Issue: 8, Page: 681-690
2023
- 2Citations
- 3Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
The law distinguishes between several forms of intentional participation in life-shortening or life-ending acts (“euthanasia”). Therapy limitation is permitted or even required if the prerequisites for a medical intervention are no longer present. In contrast, active-direct killing (upon request) is categorically prohibited (§ 216 “Strafgesetzbuch” [StGB]). Considering the “fundamental right to self-determined dying”, however, there is now a clear tendency to narrow the scope of punishable offences. This liberal “spirit of time” has already prevailed for assisted suicide, provided that it is carried out in a “freely responsible” manner. For pain therapy to reduce suffering, risks may be taken in light of the protection of life; however, here too, legitimization is required through the principle of actual or at least presumed consent. There are challenges in assessing and executing the patient’s will in (suicidal) emergency situations, especially the adherence to autonomously made decisions on death.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85173709132&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00063-023-01074-z; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37815665; https://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00063-023-01074-z; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00063-023-01074-z; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00063-023-01074-z
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know