Pedicle subtraction osteotomy to correct rigid deformities
Operative Orthopadie und Traumatologie, ISSN: 1439-0981, Vol: 31, Issue: 4, Page: 301-310
2019
- 2Citations
- 4Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations2
- Citation Indexes2
- CrossRef1
- Captures4
- Readers4
Article Description
Objective: The aim of the surgery is to restore the sagittal profile in the event of a mismatch of the patient’s spinopelvic parameters and high patient suffering. Indications: Clinically symptomatic sagittal imbalance due to degeneration, trauma or after spinal surgery which can not be adequately treated by conservative therapy. Contraindications: Severe general disease of the patient; local or systemic inflammation. Surgical technique: A dorsal approach is used to resect the dorsal vertebral structures and to perform an osteotomy to the anterior edge of the spine. Postoperative management: Rest with a load limit of 5 kg for 3 months. Prohibition of deep sitting for this time. Results: The pedicle subtraction osteotomy is described in the literature as a reliable method for the treatment of sagittal imbalance. The high rate of described complications should be discussed preoperatively with the patient.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85066857173&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00064-019-0609-5; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31161243; http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00064-019-0609-5; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00064-019-0609-5; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00064-019-0609-5
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know