Simultaneous neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy with capecitabine and oxaliplatin for locally advanced rectal cancer: Treatment outcome outside clinical trials
Strahlentherapie und Onkologie, ISSN: 0179-7158, Vol: 188, Issue: 5, Page: 377-382
2012
- 9Citations
- 11Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations9
- Citation Indexes9
- CrossRef9
- Captures11
- Readers11
- 11
Article Description
Background. Phase II trials of neoadjuvant treatment in UICC-TNM stage II and III rectal cancer with capecitabine and oxaliplatin demonstrated favourable rates on tumour regression with acceptable toxicity. Patients and methods. Retrospective evaluation of 34 patients treated from 2005-2008 outside clinical trials (CTR) with neoadjuvant irradiation (45-50.4 Gy) and simultaneous capecitabine 825 mg/m2 b.i.d. on days 1-14 and 22-35 and oxaliplatin 50 mg/m2 on days 1, 8, 22 and 29 (CAPOX). Twenty-six (77%) patients received one or two courses of capecitabine 1,000 mg/m2 b.i.d. on days 1-14 and oxaliplatin 130 mg/m2 on day 1 (XELOX) prior to simultaneous chemoradiotherapy. Results. UICC-TNM stage regression was observed in 60% (n = 20). Dworak's regression grades 3 and 4 were achieved in 18.2% (n = 6) and 15.1% (n = 5) of the patients. Sphincter-preserving surgery was performed in 53% (n = 8) of patients with a tumour of the lower rectum. Within the mean observation of 24 months, none of the patients relapsed locally, 1 patient had progressive disease and 5 patients (15%) relapsed distantly. Toxicity of grade 3 and 4 was mainly diarrhoea 18% (n = 6) and perianal pain 9% (n = 3). Nevertheless, severe cardiac events (n = 2), severe electrolyte disturbances (n = 2), and syncopes (n = 2) were observed as well. Conclusion. Treatment efficacy and common toxicity are similar to the reports of phase I/II trials. However, several severe adverse events were observed in our cohort study. The predisposing factors for these events have yet to be studied and may have implications for the selection of patients outside CTR. © Springer-Verlag 2012.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84862663966&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00066-012-0073-8; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22402868; http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00066-012-0073-8; http://www.springerlink.com/index/10.1007/s00066-012-0073-8; http://www.springerlink.com/index/pdf/10.1007/s00066-012-0073-8; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00066-012-0073-8; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00066-012-0073-8
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know