Temporal changes in tumor oxygenation and perfusion upon normo- and hyperbaric inspiratory hyperoxia
Strahlentherapie und Onkologie, ISSN: 1439-099X, Vol: 192, Issue: 3, Page: 174-181
2016
- 10Citations
- 19Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations10
- Citation Indexes10
- 10
- CrossRef4
- Captures19
- Readers19
- 14
Article Description
Background: Inspiratory hyperoxia under hyperbaric conditions has been shown to effectively reduce tumor hypoxia and to improve radiosensitivity. However, applying irradiation (RT) under hyperbaric conditions is technically difficult in the clinical setting since RT after decompression may be effective only if tumor pO remains elevated for a certain period of time. The aim of the present study was to analyze the time course of tumor oxygenation and perfusion during and after hyperbaric hyperoxia. Materials and methods: Tumor oxygenation, red blood cell (RBC) flux for perfusion monitoring, and vascular resistance were assessed continuously in experimental rat DS-sarcomas by polarographic catheter electrodes and laser Doppler flowmetry at 1 and 2 atm (bar) of environmental pressure during breathing of pure O or carbogen (95 % O + 5 % CO). Results: During room air breathing, the tumor pO followed very rapidly within a few minutes the change of the ambient pressure during compression or decompression. With O breathing under hyperbaric conditions, the tumor pO increased more than expected based on the rise of the environmental pressure, although the time course was comparably rapid. Breathing carbogen, the tumor pO followed with a slight delay of the pressure change, and within 10 min after decompression the baseline values were reached again. RBC flux increased during carbogen breathing but remained almost constant with pure O, indicating a vasodilation (decrease in vascular resistance) with carbogen but a vasoconstriction (increase in vascular resistance) with O during hyperbaric conditions. Conclusion: Since the tumor pO directly followed the environmental pressure, teletherapy after hyperbaric conditions does not seem to be promising as the pO reaches baseline values again within 5–10 min after decompression.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84959226599&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00066-015-0916-1; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26501141; http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00066-015-0916-1; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00066-015-0916-1; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00066-015-0916-1; https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007%2Fs00066-015-0916-1.pdf; http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs00066-015-0916-1; http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00066-015-0916-1/fulltext.html; https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00066-015-0916-1.pdf; http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00066-015-0916-1.pdf; http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00066-015-0916-1
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know