Replacement of perioperative blood loss for cancer patients: Results of a survey among surgical departments in Germany
Chirurg, ISSN: 0009-4722, Vol: 81, Issue: 11, Page: 999-1004
2010
- 3Citations
- 7Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations3
- Citation Indexes3
- CrossRef3
- Captures7
- Readers7
Article Description
Background: The need for red blood cell units in cancer surgery is increasing. The role of the better immunological options, such as preoperative blood donation or intraoperative autologous blood salvage is not known. The aim of this survey was to clarify the transfusion setting and options for cancer patients in Germany. Method: A questionnaire was send to 90 directors of surgical departments in Germany. Results: A total of 60 directors answered the questionnaire. In most cases the blood loss is compensated by allogenic blood transfusions. The possibility of preoperative blood donation exists in 85% of the hospitals and is offered in 3% for cancer patients. The intraoperative blood salvage is possible in 93% of the hospitals and 10% use this procedure without an additional purifying process for cancer patients. Of the hospitals 31% are able to irradiate blood collected intraoperatively, but only 11% use this for cancer patients. Conclusion: Perioperative blood loss is compensated by allogenic blood transfusion. The better immunological procedures, such as preoperative blood donation or intraoperative blood salvage, are not used because of the higher costs and the possible retransfusion of tumor cells. © 2010 Springer-Verlag.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=78349287319&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00104-010-1914-6; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20237747; http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00104-010-1914-6; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00104-010-1914-6; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00104-010-1914-6; http://www.springerlink.com/index/10.1007/s00104-010-1914-6; http://www.springerlink.com/index/pdf/10.1007/s00104-010-1914-6
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know