Neoadjuvant therapy concepts for liver metastases
Chirurg, ISSN: 0009-4722, Vol: 82, Issue: 11, Page: 989-994
2011
- 7Citations
- 22Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations7
- Citation Indexes7
- CrossRef5
- Captures22
- Readers22
- 17
Article Description
The resection of liver metastases offers the option of long-term survival for patients with colorectal carcinoma. With regard to resectability three clinical situations can be identified: patients with resectable liver metastases, those with potentially resectable liver metastases and patients with disseminated metastatic disease. Patients with potentially resectable liver metastases should be treated with regimens with high response rates. According to a metaanalysis patients with resectable liver metastases have a better disease-free survival with the combination of resection and chemotherapy. If neoadjuvant therapy is planned in resectable patients the FOLFOX regimen is the schedule with the highest level of evidence. In potentially resectable liver metastases the regimens FOLFIRI/cetuximab and FOLFOXIRI have demonstrated higher response and resection rates in phase III trials. During neoadjuvant therapy resectability should be regularly reevaluated. Operations should be planned as soon as resectability is achieved because a longer therapy will increase morbidity and because of uncertainty over the approach to patients with complete remission. © 2011 Springer-Verlag.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=80855131559&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00104-011-2131-7; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22033894; http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00104-011-2131-7; http://www.springerlink.com/index/10.1007/s00104-011-2131-7; http://www.springerlink.com/index/pdf/10.1007/s00104-011-2131-7; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00104-011-2131-7; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00104-011-2131-7
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know