Pitfalls in communicating with patients with chronic pain in urology—from pain games to loss of authority
Urologie, ISSN: 2731-7072, Vol: 62, Issue: 6, Page: 597-601
2023
- 1Citations
- 6Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Review Description
Patients with chronic pain syndromes are often referred to as “difficult” patients. In addition to positive expectations of the physicians’ competence, pain patients often express understandable doubts about the appropriateness and efficiency of new treatment options and are afraid of rejection and devaluation. Hope and disappointment, idealization and devaluation alternate in a characteristic way. This article demonstrates the pitfalls of communicating with patients suffering from chronic pain and provides recommendations for improving physician–patient interaction based on acceptance, honesty and empathy.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85153052072&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00120-023-02085-6; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37076604; https://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00120-023-02085-6; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00120-023-02085-6; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00120-023-02085-6
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know