Slow moderate pressure recruitment maneuver minimizes negative circulatory and lung mechanic side effects: Evaluation of recruitment maneuvers using electric impedance tomography
Intensive Care Medicine, ISSN: 0342-4642, Vol: 31, Issue: 12, Page: 1706-1714
2005
- 104Citations
- 89Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations104
- Citation Indexes103
- 103
- CrossRef73
- Policy Citations1
- Policy Citation1
- Captures89
- Readers89
- 89
Article Description
Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of different lung recruitment maneuvers using electric impedance tomography. Design and setting: Experimental study in animal model of acute lung injury in an animal research laboratory. Subjects: Fourteen pigs with saline lavage induced lung injury. Interventions: Lung volume, regional ventilation distribution, gas exchange, and hemodynamics were monitored during three different recruitment procedures: (a) vital capacity maneuver to an inspiratory pressure of 40 cmHO (ViCM), (b) pressure-controlled recruitment maneuver with peak pressure 40 and PEEP 20 cmHO, both maneuvers repeated three times for 30 s (PCRM), and (c) a slow recruitment with PEEP elevation to 15 cmHO with end inspiratory pauses for 7 s twice per minute over 15 min (SLRM). Measurements and results: Improvement in lung volume, compliance, and gas exchange were similar in all three procedures 15 min after recruitment. Ventilation in dorsal regions of the lungs increased by 60% as a result of increased regional compliance. During PCRM compliance decreased by 50% in the ventral region. Cardiac output decreased by 63±4% during ViCM, 44±2% during PCRM, and 21±3% during SLRM. Conclusions: In a lavage model of acute lung injury alveolar recruitment can be achieved with a slow lower pressure recruitment maneuver with less circulatory depression and negative lung mechanic side effects than with higher pressure recruitment maneuvers. With electric impedance tomography it was possible to monitor lung volume changes continuously. © Springer-Verlag 2005.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=27944472551&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00134-005-2799-6; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16177920; http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00134-005-2799-6; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00134-005-2799-6; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00134-005-2799-6; http://www.springerlink.com/index/10.1007/s00134-005-2799-6; http://www.springerlink.com/index/pdf/10.1007/s00134-005-2799-6
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know