Effects of esmolol on systemic and pulmonary hemodynamics and on oxygenation in pigs with hypodynamic endotoxin shock
Intensive Care Medicine, ISSN: 0342-4642, Vol: 37, Issue: 8, Page: 1344-1351
2011
- 74Citations
- 60Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations74
- Citation Indexes74
- 74
- CrossRef40
- Captures60
- Readers60
- 60
Article Description
Purpose: The aim of this experimental study is to investigate cardiovascular tolerance of blockade of beta-adrenergic receptors in an endotoxin model. Design: Prospective, randomized, controlled study. Setting: Animal laboratory in a university medical center. Methods: Ten anesthetized, mechanically ventilated pigs were challenged with intravenous lipopolysaccharide (LPS) to achieve a status of profound hypodynamic shock. Systemic and pulmonary hemodynamics and cardiac output were continuously monitored throughout the 5-h study period, and blood samples were taken at baseline (T - 30 min), 1 h from the beginning of LPS infusion (T + 60 min), and every 2 h (T + 180 min and T + 300 min). Animals were randomly assigned to continuous intravenous esmolol infusion titrated to decrease heart rate by 20% or isotonic saline. Results: Esmolol decreased heart rate by 20%, while in the saline group, heart rate increased by 7% and 22% at T + 180 min and T + 300 min, respectively (p < 0.001). In esmolol-treated animals, cardiac index decreased by 9% at T + 180 min and by 2% at T + 300 min, and in controls by 14% at T + 180 min and by 27% at T + 300 min (p = 0.870). In esmolol-treated animals, median (interquartile range, IQR) stroke index was 31 (6) and 47 (11) ml/min/m at T + 180 min and T + 300 min, respectively, and decreased steadily from 45 (20) to 18 (13) ml/min/m in controls (p = 0.030). There were no significant differences between groups for any other hemodynamics variables, except for systemic vascular resistance (SVR) (p = 0.017). Conclusions: In large animals with endotoxemic shock, continuous infusion of esmolol, a selective beta-1 adrenergic blocker, titrated to decrease heart rate by 20%, was well tolerated and may offset LPS-induced cardiac dysfunction by a preload positive effect. © 2011 Copyright jointly held by Springer and ESICM.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=79961027258&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00134-011-2236-y; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21567116; http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00134-011-2236-y; http://www.springerlink.com/index/10.1007/s00134-011-2236-y; http://www.springerlink.com/index/pdf/10.1007/s00134-011-2236-y; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00134-011-2236-y; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00134-011-2236-y
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know