Effects of hydroxyethyl starch in subgroups of patients with severe sepsis: Exploratory post-hoc analyses of a randomised trial
Intensive Care Medicine, ISSN: 1432-1238, Vol: 39, Issue: 11, Page: 1963-1971
2013
- 18Citations
- 83Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations18
- Citation Indexes15
- 15
- CrossRef12
- Policy Citations2
- Policy Citation2
- Clinical Citations1
- PubMed Guidelines1
- Captures83
- Readers83
- 83
Article Description
Purpose: It has been speculated that certain subgroups of sepsis patients may benefit from treatment with hydroxyethyl starch (HES) 130/0.42, specifically in the earlier resuscitation of patients with more severely impaired circulation. Methods: This was a post-hoc, subgroup analysis of all 798 patients with severe sepsis randomised in the 6S trial according to time from ICU admission to randomisation, surgery and fluids given prior to randomisation and markers of shock at randomisation. Intervention effects estimated as risk ratios were analysed between the HES versus Ringer's acetate groups to detect subgroup heterogeneity of the effects on 90-day mortality. Multiple logistic regression was used to adjust for risk factors. Results: Most baseline characteristics were comparable between the HES and Ringer's acetate groups in the different subgroups. There was no heterogeneity in the intervention effect on 90-day mortality in the following subgroups: Randomisation earlier than 4 h after ICU admission versus later (test of interaction P = 0.85), surgery versus no surgery (P = 0.42), colloids given versus not given (P = 0.57), <2 l of crystalloids given prior to randomisation vs. >2 l (P = 0.88) or plasma lactate >4 mmol/l versus <4 mmol/l (P = 0.54), hypotension versus no hypotension (P = 0.32) or use of vasopressor or inotropic agents at randomisation versus no use (P = 0.10). Conclusions: The increased 90-day mortality observed in patients with severe sepsis resuscitated with HES 130/0.42 did not appear to depend on time course, surgery or fluids given prior to randomisation or on markers of shock at randomisation. As the analyses were planned post hoc and their power is reduced, the results should be interpreted with caution. © 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg and ESICM.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84885431033&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00134-013-3090-x; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24037226; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00962156; http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00134-013-3090-x; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00134-013-3090-x; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00134-013-3090-x
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know