Intraoperative biological augmentation of tendons and entheses
Arthroskopie, ISSN: 0933-7946, Vol: 26, Issue: 2, Page: 99-104
2013
- 3Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Captures3
- Readers3
Article Description
In spite of further developments in surgical techniques for tendon and entheses reconstruction procedures, the retearing rate after tendon and tendon-bone repair remains high. The reason is that instead of native tissue, scar tissue with reduced functional and structural quality forms at the reconstruction site. In order to improve tendon and enthesis healing several therapy strategies have been developed for biological improvement of the repair area. This article provides an overview of the current evidence of augmentation techniques for tendon and enthesis reconstruction using growth factors in the form of platelet concentrates, cell-based therapies and biological tendon grafts. © 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.
Bibliographic Details
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know