Generic parameter penalty architecture
Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, ISSN: 1615-1488, Vol: 58, Issue: 4, Page: 1559-1569
2018
- 3Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Captures3
- Readers3
Article Description
A new architecture for Multidisciplinary Design Optimization, called Generic Parameter Penalty Architecture, is introduced. This architecture can be configured through three parameters that manage the distribution of objective functions and consistencies between main and sub-level optimizations. The parameters can adopt values between zero and one. Five different configurations of these parameters were tested on three problems (an analytical problem, Golinski’s speed reducer, and the combustion of propane). All three parameters of four of these configurations have extreme values (either zero or one), and the fifth one has intermediate values. These values make some of configurations manage the main level and sub-level optimizations in a similar manner to that of All at Once, Collaborative Optimization, and Analytical Target Cascading, which were studied for benchmarking purposes. The convergence and relative error of the solutions obtained by the new architecture were studied and compared to those of the previously stated widespread architectures. Results show that the performance of the new architecture depends on the values of its three parameters. It adopted behaviors similar to those of the reference architectures. Finally, its convergence and relative error, in contrast to the reference architectures, increased with the complexity of the problem.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85045888026&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00158-018-1979-2; http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00158-018-1979-2; http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00158-018-1979-2.pdf; http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00158-018-1979-2/fulltext.html; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00158-018-1979-2; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00158-018-1979-2
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know