Crashworthiness design of cross-sections with the Graph and Heuristic based Topology Optimization incorporating competing designs
Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, ISSN: 1615-1488, Vol: 64, Issue: 3, Page: 1063-1077
2021
- 8Citations
- 6Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
This contribution presents a method for finding cross-section designs of crashworthiness profiles. The method combines mathematical optimization algorithms with heuristics that are based on expert knowledge. A novel version of the Graph and Heuristic based Topology Optimization (GHT) with a scheme, which pursues different competing designs, will be presented. This sequence reduces the number of necessary crash simulations and improves the ability of the method to overcome local optima. The occurring nonlinearities of crashworthiness problems present major challenges in the optimization process: geometry (e.g., large displacements and rotations), boundary condition (e.g., contact), and material (e.g., plasticity, failure, and strain rate dependency). Furthermore, the large number of design variables, the existence of bifurcation points, and the expensive determination of gradient information pose additional challenges. In the GHT, the actual optimization problem is divided into two optimization loops nested in each other. In the outer optimization loop, heuristics derived from expert knowledge change the topology of the structure based on simulation data from crash simulations. In the inner optimization loop, conventional universal optimization algorithms are used for shape and sizing optimizations to evaluate and improve the suggested designs. The geometry of the profile cross-section is described by a mathematical graph. The graph is generated according to a syntax that allows complex geometric modifications such as topology changes. Graph-based algorithms are used for checking the geometry to ensure the manufacturability of the designs at any time of the optimization process.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85110867404&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00158-021-02927-x; https://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00158-021-02927-x; https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00158-021-02927-x.pdf; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00158-021-02927-x/fulltext.html; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00158-021-02927-x; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00158-021-02927-x
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know