Open screw fixation of large anterior glenoid rim fractures: Mid- and long-term results in 29 patients
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, ISSN: 0942-2056, Vol: 17, Issue: 2, Page: 195-203
2009
- 33Citations
- 78Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations33
- Citation Indexes33
- 33
- CrossRef25
- Captures78
- Readers78
- 78
Article Description
The aim of this retrospective study was to analyse the clinical, functional and radiographic outcomes of patients sustaining traumatic anterior dislocations of the shoulder in combination with large anterior glenoid rim fractures, treated by open reduction and internal screw fixation (ORIF). Twenty-nine patients with a mean follow-up of 6.5 years (2.5-12 years) were evaluated clinically using the Constant and DASH scores, radiographs in two planes and isokinetic muscle strength measurement (Biodex 3 PRO). Mean age was 41.6 years (17-68 years). There was no case of postoperative re-dislocation. Eight out of 29 patients (27.5%) underwent revision surgery to remove the screws. The mean age- and gender-adjusted Constant score was 93.3% (range 64-102%), and the mean DASH score was 10.1 points (range 0-71 points). On radiological examination, 6 patients had signs of osteoarthritis: Samilson type I (n = 3) and II (n = 3). Significant differences for maximal strength in external rotation and muscular endurance compared to the unaffected side were found (P < 0.035). Twenty-seven patients (93%) were satisfied or very satisfied with the result after surgery. ORIF seems to be a good treatment option in cases of large glenoid rim fractures to avoid re-dislocation in the mid-term. Prospective randomised studies are necessary to compare these findings with those after non-operative or arthroscopic treatment of these injuries. © 2008 Springer-Verlag.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=58849095337&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00167-008-0677-9; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19039575; http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00167-008-0677-9; http://www.springerlink.com/index/10.1007/s00167-008-0677-9; http://www.springerlink.com/index/pdf/10.1007/s00167-008-0677-9; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00167-008-0677-9; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00167-008-0677-9
Wiley
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know