Long-term survival analysis of posterior cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, ISSN: 0942-2056, Vol: 20, Issue: 9, Page: 1760-1765
2012
- 15Citations
- 28Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations15
- Citation Indexes15
- 15
- CrossRef13
- Captures28
- Readers28
- 28
Article Description
Purpose: Clinical factors related to cruciate-retaining knee arthroplasty failure in a long-term follow-up are yet unclear. The study was designed to evaluate the long-term survival rate of cruciate-retaining arthroplasty and clinical factors that may contribute to its failure. Methods: A total of 162 patients (188 knees) who received cruciate-retaining press-fit condylar arthroplasty from June 1993 to May 1994 were followed up. All patients were assessed clinically and radiographically. Revision for any reason was regarded as failure of arthroplasty. Results: A total of 120 patients (138 knees) were successfully followed up. Survivorship over 17 years was 92. 5%. Fourteen knees were revised. Tibial varus angle of the operated knee in the unrevised patient group was greater than in revised group. There was statistical difference between these two groups (P < 0. 05). Conclusion: Long-term survivorship of cruciate-retaining arthroplasty was fair. Varus and valgus deformity of the unoperated contralateral knee and tibial varus deformity of the operated knee could be important factors related to arthroplasty failure. Clinical relevance: This long-term follow-up result of Press-Fit Condylar cruciate-retaining arthroplasty was good considering it was an old design. The alignment of the operated knee and deformity of the unoperated contralateral knee are important clinical factors that should be paid attention to avoid unexpected arthroplasty failure. Level of evidence: IV. © 2011 Springer-Verlag.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84865504101&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00167-011-1758-8; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22072324; http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00167-011-1758-8; http://www.springerlink.com/index/10.1007/s00167-011-1758-8; http://www.springerlink.com/index/pdf/10.1007/s00167-011-1758-8; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00167-011-1758-8; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00167-011-1758-8
Wiley
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know