Achieving optimal process design for minimizing porosity in additive manufacturing of Inconel 718 using a deep learning-based pore detection approach
International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, ISSN: 1433-3015, Vol: 121, Issue: 3-4, Page: 2115-2134
2022
- 11Citations
- 35Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Among metal additive manufacturing (AM) techniques, directed energy deposition (DED) has the advantage of being able to stack various materials, including difficult-to-cut materials such as Inconel 718. However, the pores generated during the DED process may reduce the hardness or abrasion resistance of the product and cause cracks or serious damage to the product. In this study, a method for detecting and quantifying pores using machine learning to detect pores in Inconel 718 products fabricated by DED was proposed. A pore detection model with YOLOv5 was established to detect and quantify porosity by learning 2448 pore images of Inconel 718 fabricated by DED. To minimize the porosity of Inconel 718 fabricated by DED, the effect of the DED process parameters on the porosity was analyzed using the design of experiments (DOE). Using the DOE, a prediction equation for predicting porosity was established, and the optimal conditions were obtained. The product was manufactured under optimal conditions, and porosity verification experiments and hardness test were performed. The resulting trends of the predicted values and the experimental results were consistent, and the hardness increased by 6.73% in the workpiece fabricated by DED compared to the workpiece fabricated by casting.
Bibliographic Details
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know