Improving topside ionospheric empirical model using FORMOSAT-7/COSMIC-2 data
Journal of Geodesy, ISSN: 1432-1394, Vol: 97, Issue: 4
2023
- 7Citations
- 5Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
The precise description of the topside ionosphere using an ionospheric empirical model has always been a work in progress. The NeQuick topside model is greatly enhanced by adopting radio occultation data from the FORMOSAT-7/COSMIC-2 constellation. The topside scale height H formulation in the NeQuick model is simplified into a linear combination of an empirically deduced parameter H and a gradient parameter g. The two-dimensional grid maps for the H and g parameters are generated as a function of the foF2 and hmF2 parameters. Corrected H and g values can be interpolated easily from two grid maps, allowing a more accurate description of the topside ionosphere than the original NeQuick model. The improved NeQuick model (namely NeQuick_GRID model) is statistically validated by comparing it to Total Electron Content (TEC) integrated from COSMIC-2 electron density profiles and space-borne TEC derived from onboard Global Navigation Satellite System observations, respectively. The results show that the NeQuick_GRID model can reduce relative errors by 38% approximately when compared to the integrated TEC from COSMIC profiles and by 15% approximately when compared to the space-borne TEC. Furthermore, a long-term statistical analysis during years of both high and low solar activities reveals that grid maps of the scale factor H and the gradient parameter g have very similar features, allowing rapid and efficient acquisition of high-precision electron density during different solar activity.
Bibliographic Details
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know