Volumetric bone mineral density at the spine and hip in Chinese American and White women
Osteoporosis International, ISSN: 0937-941X, Vol: 23, Issue: 10, Page: 2499-2506
2012
- 18Citations
- 24Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations18
- Citation Indexes18
- 18
- CrossRef11
- Captures24
- Readers24
- 23
Article Description
Summary: This study evaluated racial differences in bone size and volumetric density at the spine and hip in preand postmenopausal Chinese American and White women. Compared with White women, Chinese American women have greater cortical volumetric bone density (vBMD) at the hip, congruent with the results at the peripheral skeleton. Introduction: Chinese American women have lower rates of fracture thanWhite women despite lower areal bone density. At the forearm and tibia, however, Chinese American women have higher cortical vBMD as well as greater trabecular and cortical thickness, but smaller bone area as measured by high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography (HR-pQCT) compared with White women. Since HRpQCT data are obtained at peripheral sites, it is unclear whether these differences are relevant to the clinically important lumbar spine and hip. This study assesses racial differences in bone size and vBMD at the spine and hip in Chinese American and White women. Methods: QCT of the spine and hip was measured to assess racial differences in bone size, structure, and vBMD in pre-(n083) and postmenopausal (n050) Chinese American and White women. Data were adjusted for weight, height, physical activity, total calcium intake, parathyroid hormone, and 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels. Results: Among premenopausal women, lumbar spine trabecular vBMD was 5.8% greater in Chinese American versus White women (p00.01). At the hip, cortical vBMD was 3% greater at the femoral neck (p00.05) and 3.6% greater at the total hip (p00.01) in premenopausal Chinese American compared with White women. Among postmenopausal women, there was no difference in lumbar spine trabecular vBMD. Cortical vBMD was 4% greater at the total hip (p0 0.02) and tended to be greater at the femoral neck (p00.058) in Chinese American versus White women. Conclusions: Consistent with earlier findings in the peripheral skeleton, cortical vBMD is greater at the hip in Chinese American versus White women. © International Osteoporosis Foundation and National Osteoporosis Foundation 2011.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84867337958&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00198-011-1855-z; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22147209; http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00198-011-1855-z; http://www.springerlink.com/index/10.1007/s00198-011-1855-z; http://www.springerlink.com/index/pdf/10.1007/s00198-011-1855-z; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00198-011-1855-z; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00198-011-1855-z
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know