Oral uptake of nanoparticles: human relevance and the role of in vitro systems
Archives of Toxicology, ISSN: 1432-0738, Vol: 90, Issue: 10, Page: 2297-2314
2016
- 73Citations
- 96Captures
- 1Mentions
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations73
- Citation Indexes73
- 73
- CrossRef56
- Captures96
- Readers96
- 96
- Mentions1
- News Mentions1
- 1
Most Recent News
Cutaneous Evaluation of Fe3O4 Nanoparticles: An Assessment Based on 2D and 3D Human Epidermis Models Under Standard and UV Conditions
Introduction Human exposure to engineered nanoparticles (NPs) has increased considerably in recent years due to myriad of NPs applications in the commercial products, though investigations
Review Description
Nanoparticles (NPs) present in environment, consumer and health products, food and medical applications lead to a high degree of human exposure and concerns about potential adverse effects on human health. For the general population, the exposure through contact with the skin, inhalation and oral uptake are most relevant. Since in vivo testing is only partly able to study the effects of human oral exposure, physiologically relevant in vitro systems are being developed. This review compared the three routes taking into account the estimated concentration, size of the exposed area, morphology of the involved barrier and translocation rate. The high amounts of NPs in food, the large absorption area and the relatively high translocation rate identified oral uptake as most important portal of entry for NPs into the body. Changes of NP properties in the physiological fluids, mechanisms to cross mucus and epithelial barrier, and important issues in the use of laboratory animals for oral exposure are mentioned. The ability of in vitro models to address the varying conditions along the oro-gastrointestinal tract is discussed, and requirements for physiologically relevant in vitro testing of orally ingested NPs are listed.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84976324445&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00204-016-1765-0; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27342244; http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00204-016-1765-0; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00204-016-1765-0; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00204-016-1765-0
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know