PlumX Metrics
Embed PlumX Metrics

The effects of adolescent methylphenidate self-administration on responding for a conditioned reward, amphetamine-induced locomotor activity, and neuronal activation

Psychopharmacology, ISSN: 0033-3158, Vol: 208, Issue: 3, Page: 455-468
2010
  • 19
    Citations
  • 0
    Usage
  • 37
    Captures
  • 0
    Mentions
  • 0
    Social Media
Metric Options:   Counts1 Year3 Year

Metrics Details

Article Description

Background: Abuse of methylphenidate (Ritalin) is rising, particularly during adolescence and early adulthood, but the long-term effects of its abuse during adolescence are unclear. Methods: In experiment 1, we examined the effect of adolescent methylphenidate self-administration (0.0625 mg/infusion), as compared with cocaine self-administration (0.125 mg/infusion), under a fixed ratio 1 schedule of reinforcement in male Sprague-Dawley rats during adolescence (postnatal day (PND) 32-47) on adult dopamine-mediated behaviors (PND >70). These included responding for a conditioned reward (CR), a measure of incentive motivation, and amphetamine-induced locomotor activity. In experiment 2, we aimed to replicate and enhance the effects observed in experiment 1, and we also examined the effects of methylphenidate self-administration during adolescence on adult amphetamine-induced zif268 messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA) expression. Results: Adolescent rats self-administered both cocaine and methylphenidate. There was no effect of adolescent drug self-administration on adult baseline or amphetamine-induced responding for a CR. However, both adolescent methylphenidate and cocaine self-administration increased amphetamine-induced locomotion. Adolescent methylphenidate self-administration also enhanced amphetamine-induced zif268 mRNA expression in the nucleus accumbens. Conclusions: Our findings suggest that repeated, behaviorally contingent exposure to methylphenidate during adolescence enhances responsivity to the locomotor-stimulating and neuronal activating effects of amphetamine but not incentive motivation. © 2009 Springer-Verlag.

Provide Feedback

Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know