Comparison of separation performance of laser-ablated and wet-etched microfluidic devices
Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry, ISSN: 1618-2642, Vol: 399, Issue: 4, Page: 1473-1479
2011
- 19Citations
- 41Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations19
- Citation Indexes19
- 19
- CrossRef11
- Captures41
- Readers41
- 41
Article Description
Laser ablation of glass allows for production of microfluidic devices without the need for hydrofluoric acid and photolithography. The goal of this study was to compare the separation performance of microfluidic devices produced using a low-cost laser ablation system and conventional wet etching. During laser ablation, cracking of the glass substrate was prevented by heating the glass to 300 °C. A range of laser energy densities was found to produce channel depths ranging from 4 to 35 μm and channel widths from 118 to 162 μm. The electroosmotic flow velocity was lower in laser-ablated devices, 0.110∈±∈0.005 cm∈∈∈s, as compared to wet-etched microfluidic chips, 0.126∈±∈0.003 cm∈∈∈s. Separations of both small and large molecules performed on both wet- and laser-ablated devices were compared by examining limits of detection, theoretical plate count, and peak asymmetry. Laser-induced fluorescence detection limits were 10 pM fluorescein for both types of devices. Laser-ablated and wet-etched microfluidic chips had reproducible migration times with ≤∈∈∈2.8% relative standard deviation and peak asymmetries ranged from 1.0 to 1.8. Numbers of theoretical plates were between 2.8- and 6.2-fold higher on the wet-etched devices compared to laser-ablated devices. Nevertheless, resolution between small and large analytes was accomplished, which indicates that laser ablation may find an application in pedagogical studies of electrophoresis or microfluidic devices, or in settings where hydrofluoric acid cannot be used. © 2010 Springer-Verlag.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=79251628123&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00216-010-4144-3; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20827468; http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00216-010-4144-3; http://www.springerlink.com/index/10.1007/s00216-010-4144-3; http://www.springerlink.com/index/pdf/10.1007/s00216-010-4144-3; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00216-010-4144-3; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00216-010-4144-3
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know