Droplet-based optofluidic systems for measuring enzyme kinetics
Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry, ISSN: 1618-2650, Vol: 412, Issue: 14, Page: 3265-3283
2020
- 31Citations
- 76Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations31
- Citation Indexes30
- 30
- CrossRef3
- Patent Family Citations1
- Patent Families1
- Captures76
- Readers76
- 76
Review Description
The study of enzyme kinetics is of high significance in understanding metabolic networks in living cells and using enzymes in industrial applications. To gain insight into the catalytic mechanisms of enzymes, it is necessary to screen an enormous number of reaction conditions, a process that is typically laborious, time-consuming, and costly when using conventional measurement techniques. In recent times, droplet-based microfluidic systems have proved themselves to be of great utility in large-scale biological experimentation, since they consume a minimal sample, operate at high analytical throughput, are characterized by efficient mass and heat transfer, and offer high levels of integration and automation. The primary goal of this review is the introduction of novel microfluidic tools and detection methods for use in high-throughput and sensitive analysis of enzyme kinetics. The first part of this review focuses on introducing basic concepts of enzyme kinetics and describing most common microfluidic approaches, with a particular focus on segmented flow. Herein, the key advantages include accurate control over the flow behavior, efficient mass and heat transfer, multiplexing, and high-level integration with detection modalities. The second part describes the current state-of-the-art platforms for high-throughput and sensitive analysis of enzyme kinetics. In addition to our categorization of recent advances in measuring enzyme kinetics, we have endeavored to critically assess the limitations of each of these detection approaches and propose strategies to improve measurements in droplet-based microfluidics. [Figure not available: see fulltext.]
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85076811946&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00216-019-02294-z; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31853606; http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00216-019-02294-z; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00216-019-02294-z; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00216-019-02294-z
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know