Total and appendicular lean mass reference ranges for Australian men and women: The Geelong osteoporosis study
Calcified Tissue International, ISSN: 1432-0827, Vol: 94, Issue: 4, Page: 363-372
2014
- 142Citations
- 219Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations142
- Citation Indexes142
- 142
- CrossRef20
- Captures219
- Readers219
- 219
Article Description
The aim of this study was to develop reference ranges for total and appendicular lean mass measured using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) from a randomly selected population-based sample of men and women residing in southeastern Australia. Men (n = 1,411) and women (n = 960) aged 20-93 years, enrolled in the Geelong Osteoporosis Study, were randomly selected from the Barwon Statistical Division using the electoral roll as a sampling frame in 2001-2006 (67 % participation) and 1993-1997 (77 % participation), respectively. Using DXA (Lunar DPX-L or Prodigy Pro) at baseline for men and at the 10-year follow-up for women (2004-2008), total and appendicular lean mass were measured. Means and standard deviations for each lean mass measure (absolute and relative to height squared) were generated for each age decade, and cutpoints equivalent to T scores of -2.0 and -1.0 were calculated using data from young adult men and women aged 20-39 years. Young adult reference data were derived from 374 men and 308 women. Cutpoints for relative appendicular lean mass equal to T scores of -2.0 and -1.0 were 6.94 and 7.87 kg/m for men and 5.30 and 6.07 kg/m for women. The proportions of men and women aged ≥80 years with a T score less than -2.0 were 16.0 and 6.2 %, respectively. These reference ranges may be useful for identifying lean mass deficits in the assessment of muscle wasting and sarcopenia. © 2014 Springer Science+Business Media.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84896491387&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00223-013-9830-7; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24390582; http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00223-013-9830-7; https://researchbank.acu.edu.au/fhs_pub/5087; https://researchbank.acu.edu.au/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=6086&context=fhs_pub; http://researchbank.acu.edu.au/fhs_pub/5087; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00223-013-9830-7; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00223-013-9830-7; http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs00223-013-9830-7; https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007%2Fs00223-013-9830-7.pdf; http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00223-013-9830-7
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know