Veritas® bovine pericardium for immediate breast reconstruction: A xenograft alternative to acellular dermal matrix products
European Journal of Plastic Surgery, ISSN: 0930-343X, Vol: 35, Issue: 10, Page: 717-722
2012
- 36Citations
- 39Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations36
- Citation Indexes36
- 36
- CrossRef16
- Captures39
- Readers39
- 39
Article Description
Background The technical advantages in utilizing human acellular dermalmatrix (ADM) products as pectoral extenders in immediate breast reconstruction with tissue expanders or implants are well documented in the medical literature. In this study, the authors examine a commonly used biologic xenograft product that has not yet been described in the medical literature for use in immediate breast reconstruction to determine whether a lower overall complication rate is identified compared to published data on ADM products. Methods A retrospective multicenter medical record review of data on 54 subjects in 93 tissue expander/implant-based, consecutive, immediate breast reconstructions from three surgeons at different institutions was performed in which Veritas® bovine pericardium was used as the biologic graft material for the pectoral extender. Results Over a 24-month period with an average of 11-month follow-up, complication rates using Veritas® in breast reconstruction for seroma formation (7.5 %), marginal skin flap necrosis (5.4 %) infection (6.5 %), and capsular contracture (0 %) were found to compare equally or favorably with statistically significant lower overall complications relative to one comparison study and lower rates of marginal skin flap necrosis relative to two comparison studies based upon previously published data from multisurgeon studies using ADM products. Conclusions Overall complications were found to be lower with Veritas® than ADM products in comparable multisurgeon studies, though this was found to be statistically significant in only one comparison study. Level of Evidence: Level II, theraputic study. © The Author(s) 2012.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84866734776&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00238-012-0736-9; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23002328; http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00238-012-0736-9; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00238-012-0736-9; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00238-012-0736-9; http://www.springerlink.com/index/10.1007/s00238-012-0736-9; http://www.springerlink.com/index/pdf/10.1007/s00238-012-0736-9
Springer Nature
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know