Revisiting the Design of the Long-Term Evolution Experiment with Escherichia coli
Journal of Molecular Evolution, ISSN: 1432-1432, Vol: 91, Issue: 3, Page: 241-253
2023
- 19Citations
- 77Captures
- 4Mentions
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations19
- Citation Indexes19
- 19
- CrossRef4
- Captures77
- Readers77
- 77
- Mentions4
- References2
- Wikipedia2
- Blog Mentions1
- Blog1
- News Mentions1
- News1
Most Recent Blog
How Not to Start a Microbial Evolution Experiment
Amir Mani (University of Chicago Medical School) wrote me yesterday about a paper he had read, and about which he was a bit skeptical. The paper reports a striking case of rapid parallel evolution in an experiment with bacteria. I’m … Continue reading →
Most Recent News
Michigan State University Details Findings in Escherichia coli (Revisiting the Design of the Long-term Evolution Experiment With Escherichia Coli)
2023 APR 20 (NewsRx) -- By a News Reporter-Staff News Editor at NewsRx Life Science Daily -- Research findings on Gram-Negative Bacteria - Escherichia coli
Review Description
The long-term evolution experiment (LTEE) with Escherichia coli began in 1988 and it continues to this day, with its 12 populations having recently reached 75,000 generations of evolution in a simple, well-controlled environment. The LTEE was designed to explore open-ended questions about the dynamics and repeatability of phenotypic and genetic evolution. Here I discuss various aspects of the LTEE’s experimental design that have enabled its stability and success, including the choices of the culture regime, growth medium, ancestral strain, and statistical replication. I also discuss some of the challenges associated with a long-running project, such as handling procedural errors (e.g., cross-contamination) and managing the expanding collection of frozen samples. The simplicity of the experimental design and procedures have supported the long-term stability of the LTEE. That stability—along with the inherent creativity of the evolutionary process and the emergence of new genomic technologies—provides a platform that has allowed talented students and collaborators to pose questions, collect data, and make discoveries that go far beyond anything I could have imagined at the start of the LTEE.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85148112463&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00239-023-10095-3; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36790511; https://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00239-023-10095-3; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00239-023-10095-3; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00239-023-10095-3
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know