Factors affecting radiation exposure in patients undergoing endoscopic treatment for urolithiasis
Urolithiasis, ISSN: 2194-7236, Vol: 52, Issue: 1, Page: 148
2024
- 2Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Captures2
- Readers2
Article Description
Imaging techniques, such as computed tomography (CT) and fluoroscopy, are essential for the diagnosis and treatment of urolithiasis. There is increasing concern regarding the cumulative radiation dose associated with medical imaging and its adverse effects. This study aimed to assess radiation exposure in patients undergoing endoscopic management of urolithiasis and to identify factors associated with increased exposure. A retrospective analysis of all consecutive symptomatic urolithiasis cases who underwent endoscopic surgery over a two-year period at a tertiary referral center was performed. The cumulative radiation dose was recorded per stone episode, and the effective dose (ED) then calculated. Multivariable regression analysis was performed to determine the association between ED and patient, stone, and procedural characteristics. Between January 2020 and December 2021, 250 patients underwent endoscopic intervention for urolithiasis; 71% (n = 178) were male with a median age of 48 years (IQR 35–59). The median stone size was 6 mm (IQR, 5–8 mm) and the median stone volume was 110 mm (IQR, 60–206 mm). Most stones were located in the distal ureter (46%, n = 114). The median ED received per stone episode was 3.99 mSv (IQR 2.9–7 mSv). On multivariable analysis, BMI, number of CT scans performed, CT protocol used, and repeat procedures strongly predicted increased radiation dose (p < 0.01). It is important for urologists to consider the cumulative radiation dosage in patients with urolithiasis. Strategies to minimize exposure, such as avoiding re-imaging, low-dose CTs, and collimation of the region of interest with judicious magnification, should be considered during treatment.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85206274185&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00240-024-01648-2; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39402339; https://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00240-024-01648-2; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00240-024-01648-2; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00240-024-01648-2
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know