PlumX Metrics
Embed PlumX Metrics

Electrocardiography is Unreliable to Detect Potential Lethal Hyperkalemia in Patients with Non-dialysis Chronic Kidney Disease

Pediatric Cardiology, ISSN: 1432-1971, Vol: 43, Issue: 5, Page: 1064-1070
2022
  • 1
    Citations
  • 0
    Usage
  • 4
    Captures
  • 0
    Mentions
  • 0
    Social Media
Metric Options:   Counts1 Year3 Year

Metrics Details

Article Description

Hemodialysis patients with hypercalcemia are less likely to manifest the usual electrocardiographic changes associated with hyperkalemia than in those with normal renal function. This study was conducted to determine whether electrocardiography (ECG) is a reliable indicator to detect severe life-threatening hyperkalemia in non-dialysis CKD patients. The study was conducted at three referral university hospitals between July 2017 and June 2018. Severe hyperkalemia was defined as serum potassium concentration ≥ 8.0 mEq/L. Serum potassium, sodium, bicarbonate, calcium, and creatinine concentrations were measured and simultaneous 12-lead ECG was obtained. Patients with end-stage renal disease receiving renal replacement therapy were excluded. Also excluded were patients with the usual ECG abnormalities to hyperkalemia. Of the 438 patients screened, 10 (2.3%) aged 2–14 years with severe hyperkalemia and normal ECG findings were identified. Median serum potassium level was 8.6 mEq/L (range 8.2–9.0). All had regular sinus rhythm. P, QRS, ST segment, T morphology, PR and QT interval, and QRS duration were all normal. Hyperkalemia was associated with CKD, metabolic acidosis, and hypercalcemia in all cases. Therapy with intravenous 0.9% saline, sodium bicarbonate, glucose, insulin, calcium, and salbutamol corrected the hyperkalemia in 7 patients. The remaining three patients evinced arrhythmias requiring hemodialysis. Although rare, non-dialysis CKD patients with hypercalcemia may not manifest the usual electrographic abnormalities associated with hyperkalemia. Thus, a normal ECG finding in non-dialysis CKD patients should be interpreted with caution.

Provide Feedback

Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know