Micrococcus luteus - Survival in amber
Microbial Ecology, ISSN: 0095-3628, Vol: 48, Issue: 1, Page: 120-127
2004
- 87Citations
- 6,539Usage
- 213Captures
- 6Mentions
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations87
- Citation Indexes86
- 86
- CrossRef71
- Policy Citations1
- Policy Citation1
- Usage6,539
- Downloads6,306
- 6,306
- Abstract Views233
- Captures213
- Readers213
- 213
- Mentions6
- References6
- Wikipedia6
Article Description
A growing body of evidence now supports the isolation of microorganisms from ancient materials. However, questions about the stringency of extraction methods and the genetic relatedness of isolated organisms to their closest living relatives continue to challenge the authenticity of these ancient life forms. Previous studies have successfully isolated a number of spore-forming bacteria from organic and inorganic deposits of considerable age whose survival is explained by their ability to enter suspended animation for extended periods of time. However, despite a number of putative reports, the isolation of non-spore-forming bacteria and an explanation for their survival have remained enigmatic. Here we describe the isolation of non-spore-forming cocci from a 120-million-year-old block of amber, which by genetic, morphological, and biochemical analyses are identified as belonging to the bacterial species Micrococcus luteus. Although comparison of 16S rRNA sequences from the ancient isolates with their modern counterparts is unable to confirm the precise age of these bacteria, we demonstrate, using complementary molecular and cell biological techniques, evidence supporting the view that these (and related modern members of the genus) have numerous adaptations for survival in extreme, nutrient-poor environments, traits that will assist in this bacteria's persistence and dispersal in the environment. The bacteria's ability to utilize succinic acid and process terpine-related compounds, both major components of natural amber, support its survival in this oligotrophic environment.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=4444305248&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00248-003-2016-5; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15164240; http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00248-003-2016-5; https://digitalcommons.calpoly.edu/bio_fac/355; https://digitalcommons.calpoly.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1363&context=bio_fac; http://www.springerlink.com/index/10.1007/s00248-003-2016-5; http://www.springerlink.com/index/pdf/10.1007/s00248-003-2016-5; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00248-003-2016-5; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00248-003-2016-5; http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00248-003-2016-5; http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00248-003-2016-5/fulltext.html; http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007%2Fs00248-003-2016-5.pdf; http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs00248-003-2016-5; http://europepmc.org/abstract/med/15164240
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know