The Ammonia Transport, Retention and Futile Cycling Problem in Cyanobacteria
Microbial Ecology, ISSN: 0095-3628, Vol: 65, Issue: 1, Page: 180-196
2013
- 22Citations
- 53Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations22
- Citation Indexes22
- 22
- CrossRef16
- Captures53
- Readers53
- 53
Article Description
Ammonia is the preferred nitrogen source for many algae including the cyanobacterium Synechococcus elongatis (Synechococcus R-2; PCC 7942). Modelling ammonia uptake by cells is not straightforward because it exists in solution as NH and NH. NH is readily diffusible not only via the lipid bilayer but also through aquaporins and other more specific porins. On the other hand, NH requires cationic transporters to cross a membrane. Significant intracellular ammonia pools (≈1-10 mol m) are essential for the synthesis of amino acids from ammonia. The most common model envisaged for how cells take up ammonia and use it as a nitrogen source is the "pump-leak model" where uptake occurs through a simple diffusion of NH or through an energy-driven NH pump balancing a leak of NH out of the cell. The flaw in such models is that cells maintain intracellular pools of ammonia much higher than predicted by such models. With caution, [C]-methylamine can be used as an analogue tracer for ammonia and has been used to test various models of ammonia transport and metabolism. In this study, simple "proton trapping" accumulation by the diffusion of uncharged CHNH has been compared to systems where CHNH is taken up through channels, driven by the membrane potential (ΔU) or the electrochemical potential for Na (ΔμNa). No model can be reconciled with experimental data unless the permeability of CHNH across the cell membrane is asymmetric: permeability into the cell is very high through gated porins, whereas permeability out of the cell is very low (≈40 nm s) and independent of the extracellular pH. The best model is a Na/CHNH co-porter driven by ΔμNa balancing synthesis of methylglutamine and a slow leak governed by Ficks law, and so there is significant futile cycling of methylamine across the cell membrane to maintain intracellular methylamine pools high enough for fixation by glutamine synthetase. The modified pump-leak model with asymmetric permeability of the uncharged form is a viable model for understanding ammonia uptake and retention in plants, free-living microbes and organisms in symbiotic relationships. © 2012 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84872318993&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00248-012-0111-1; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22940733; http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00248-012-0111-1; http://www.springerlink.com/index/10.1007/s00248-012-0111-1; http://www.springerlink.com/index/pdf/10.1007/s00248-012-0111-1; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00248-012-0111-1; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00248-012-0111-1
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know