Induction of defense responses against Alternaria rot by different elicitors in harvested pear fruit
Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, ISSN: 0175-7598, Vol: 70, Issue: 6, Page: 729-734
2006
- 161Citations
- 90Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations161
- Citation Indexes161
- 161
- CrossRef86
- Captures90
- Readers90
- 90
Article Description
Pear fruit (Pyrus pyrifolia L. cv. Yali) treated by different elicitors, such as salicylic acid (SA), oxalic acid, calcium chloride, and antagonistic yeast Cryptococcus laurentii, were investigated to determine the induction of defense responses. The possible mechanism by which elicitors induced the resistance of pear fruit against post-harvest disease was also evaluated. The results indicated that all the elicitors could significantly enhance defense-related enzyme activities, such as β-1,3-glucanase, phenylalanine ammonia lyase, peroxidase, and polyphenol oxidase activity, and reduce the disease incidence caused by Alternaria alternata in pear fruit (P=0.05). Among these different elicitors, SA treatment showed the best result in inducing the defense responses and reducing the decay in pear fruit. © Springer-Verlag 2005.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=33646784364&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00253-005-0125-4; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16158285; http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00253-005-0125-4; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00253-005-0125-4; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00253-005-0125-4; http://www.springerlink.com/index/10.1007/s00253-005-0125-4; http://www.springerlink.com/index/pdf/10.1007/s00253-005-0125-4
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know