Cost-effectiveness analysis of FET PET-guided target selection for the diagnosis of gliomas
European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, ISSN: 1619-7070, Vol: 39, Issue: 7, Page: 1089-1096
2012
- 41Citations
- 29Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations41
- Citation Indexes40
- 40
- CrossRef21
- Policy Citations1
- Policy Citation1
- Captures29
- Readers29
- 29
Article Description
Purpose: Several diagnostic trials have indicated that the combined use of F-fluoroethyl-l-tyrosine (FET) PET and MRI may be superior to MRI alone in selecting the biopsy site for the diagnosis of gliomas. We estimated the cost-effectiveness of the use of amino acid PET compared to MRI alone from the perspective of the German statutory health insurance. Methods: To evaluate the incremental cost-effectiveness of the use of amino acid PET, a decision tree model was built. The effectiveness of FET PET was determined by the probability of a correct diagnosis. Costs were estimated for a baseline scenario and for a more expensive scenario in which disease severity was considered. The robustness of the results was tested using deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses. Results: The combined use of PET and MRI resulted in an increase of 18.5% in the likelihood of a correct diagnosis. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio for one additional correct diagnosis using FET PET was €6,405 for the baseline scenario and €9,114 for the scenario based on higher disease severity. The probabilistic sensitivity analysis confirmed the robustness of the results. Conclusion: The model indicates that the use of amino acid PET may be cost-effective in patients with glioma. As a result of several limitations in the data used for the model, further studies are needed to confirm the results. © 2012 Springer-Verlag.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84862706088&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00259-012-2093-0; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22419257; http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00259-012-2093-0; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00259-012-2093-0; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00259-012-2093-0; http://www.springerlink.com/index/10.1007/s00259-012-2093-0; http://www.springerlink.com/index/pdf/10.1007/s00259-012-2093-0
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know