Molecular imaging with Tc-MIBI and molecular testing for mutations in differentiating benign from malignant follicular neoplasm: a prospective comparison
European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, ISSN: 1619-7089, Vol: 43, Issue: 6, Page: 1018-1026
2016
- 59Citations
- 35Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations59
- Citation Indexes57
- 57
- CrossRef36
- Clinical Citations1
- PubMed Guidelines1
- Policy Citations1
- Policy Citation1
- Captures35
- Readers35
- 35
Article Description
Purpose: To compare mutation analysis of cytology specimens and Tc-MIBI thyroid scintigraphy for differentiating benign from malignant thyroid nodules in patients with a cytological reading of follicular neoplasm. Methods: Patients ≥18 years of age with a solitary hypofunctioning thyroid nodule (≥10 mm), normal thyrotropin and calcitonin levels, and a cytological diagnosis of follicular neoplasm were prospectively enrolled. Mutation analysis and Tc-MIBI scintigraphy were performed and patients were subsequently operated on to confirm or exclude a malignant lesion. Mutations for KRAS, HRAS and NRAS and for BRAF and translocations of PAX8/PPARγ, RET/PTC1 and RET/PTC3 were investigated. Static thyroid scintigraphic images were acquired 10 and 60 min after intravenous injection of 200 MBq of Tc-MIBI and visually assessed. Additionally, the MIBI washout index was calculated using a semiquantitative method. Results: In our series, 26 % of nodules with a follicular pattern on cytology were malignant with a prevalence of follicular carcinomas. Tc-MIBI scintigraphy was found to be significantly more accurate (positive likelihood ratio 4.56 for visual assessment and 12.35 for semiquantitative assessment) than mutation analysis (positive likelihood ratio 1.74). A negative Tc-MIBI scan reliably excluded malignancy. Conclusion: In patients with a thyroid nodule cytologically diagnosed as a follicular proliferation, semiquantitative analysis of Tc-MIBI scintigraphy should be the preferred method for differentiating benign from malignant nodules. It is superior to molecular testing for the presence of differentiated thyroid cancer-associated mutations in fine-needle aspiration cytology sample material.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84951774351&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00259-015-3285-1; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26695504; http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00259-015-3285-1; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00259-015-3285-1; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00259-015-3285-1; http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00259-015-3285-1/fulltext.html; https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007%2Fs00259-015-3285-1.pdf; http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs00259-015-3285-1
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know