(+)-[F]Flubatine as a novel α4β2 nicotinic acetylcholine receptor PET ligand—results of the first-in-human brain imaging application in patients with β-amyloid PET-confirmed Alzheimer’s disease and healthy controls
European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, ISSN: 1619-7089, Vol: 48, Issue: 3, Page: 731-746
2021
- 12Citations
- 23Captures
- 1Mentions
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations12
- Citation Indexes12
- 12
- CrossRef2
- Captures23
- Readers23
- 23
- Mentions1
- News Mentions1
- 1
Most Recent News
(+)-[18F]Flubatine as a novel α4β2 nicotinic acetylcholine receptor PET ligand-results of the first-in-human brain imaging application in patients with β-amyloid PET-confirmed Alzheimer's disease and healthy controls.
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2020 Sep 16; Authors: Tiepolt S, Becker GA, Wilke S, Cecchin D, Rullmann M, Meyer PM, Barthel H, Hesse S, Patt M, Luthardt J, Wagenknecht G, Sattler B, Deuther-Conrad W, Ludwig FA, Fischer S, Gertz HJ, Smits R, Hoepping A, Steinbach J, Brust P, Sabri O PubMed: 32935187 Submit Comment
Article Description
Purposes: We present the first in-human brain PET imaging data of the new α4β2 nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (nAChR)–targeting radioligand (+)-[F]Flubatine. Aims were to develop a kinetic modeling-based approach to quantify (+)-[F]Flubatine and compare the data of healthy controls (HCs) and patients with Alzheimer’s disease (AD); to investigate the partial volume effect (PVE) on regional (+)-[F]Flubatine binding; and whether (+)-[F]Flubatine binding and cognitive test data respective β-amyloid radiotracer accumulation were correlated. Methods: We examined 11 HCs and 9 mild AD patients. All subjects underwent neuropsychological testing and [C]PiB PET/MRI examination. (+)-[F]Flubatine PET data were evaluated using full kinetic modeling and regional as well as voxel-based analyses. Results: With 270-min p.i., the unchanged parent compound amounted to 97 ± 2%. Adequate fits of the time-activity curves were obtained with the 1 tissue compartment model (1TCM). (+)-[F]Flubatine distribution volume (binding) was significantly reduced in bilateral mesial temporal cortex in AD patients compared with HCs (right 10.6 ± 1.1 vs 11.6 ± 1.4, p = 0.049; left 11.0 ± 1.1 vs 12.2 ± 1.8, p = 0.046; one-sided t tests each). PVE correction increased not only (+)-[F]Flubatine binding of approximately 15% but also standard deviation of 0.4–70%. Cognitive test data and (+)-[F]Flubatine binding were significantly correlated in the left anterior cingulate, right posterior cingulate, and right parietal cortex (r > 0.5, p < 0.05 each). In AD patients, (+)-[F]Flubatine binding and [C]PiB standardized uptake value ratios were negatively correlated in several regions; whereas in HCs, a positive correlation between cortical (+)-[F]Flubatine binding and [C]PiB accumulation in the white matter was found. No adverse event related to (+)-[F]Flubatine occurred. Conclusion: (+)-[F]Flubatine is a safe and stable PET ligand. Full kinetic modeling can be realized by 1TCM without metabolite correction. (+)-[F]Flubatine binding affinity was high enough to detect group differences. Of interest, correlation between white matter β-amyloid PET uptake and (+)-[F]Flubatine binding indicated an association between white matter integrity and availability of α4β2 nAChRs. Overall, (+)-[F]Flubatine showed favorable characteristics and has therefore the potential to serve as α4β2 nAChR–targeting PET ligand in further clinical trials.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85091048813&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00259-020-05029-w; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32935187; https://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00259-020-05029-w; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00259-020-05029-w; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00259-020-05029-w
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know