Kinetic metrics of F-FDG in normal human organs identified by systematic dynamic total-body positron emission tomography
European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, ISSN: 1619-7089, Vol: 48, Issue: 8, Page: 2363-2372
2021
- 34Citations
- 28Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations34
- Citation Indexes34
- 34
- CrossRef1
- Captures28
- Readers28
- 28
Article Description
Purpose: To investigate the kinetic metrics of 2-[F]-fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose (F-FDG) in normal organs by using dynamic total-body (TB) positron emission tomography (PET). Methods: Dynamic TB-PET was performed for nine healthy volunteers. Time-to-activity curves (TACs) were obtained by drawing regions of interest in the organs. A two-tissue compartment model was fitted for each tissue TAC. Constant rates, including k, k, and k, and the metabolic rate of FDG (MRFDG) were obtained. The parameter statistics, including the average, standard deviation, coefficient of variance, and inter-site and inter-individual variances, were compared. Results: Constant rates and MRFDG varied significantly among organs and subjects, but not among sides or sub-regions within an organ. The mean k and k ranged from 0.0158 min in the right lower lung to 1.1883 min in the anterior wall of the left ventricle (LV) myocardium and from 0.1116 min in the left parietal white matter to 4.6272 min in the left thyroid, respectively. The k was lowest in the right upper area of the liver and highest in the septal wall of the LV myocardium. Mean MRFDG ranged from 23.1696 μmol/100 g/min in the parietal cortex to 0.5945 μmol/100 g/min in the lung. Four groups of organs with similar kinetic characteristics were identified: (1) the cerebral white matter, lung, liver, muscle, bone, and bone marrow; (2) cerebral and cerebellar cortex; (3) LV myocardium and thyroid; and (4) pancreas, spleen, and kidney. Conclusion: The kinetic rates and MRFDG significantly differed among organs. The kinetic metrics of FDG parameters in normal organs can serve as a reference for future dynamic PET imaging and research.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85099001928&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00259-020-05124-y; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33416959; https://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00259-020-05124-y; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00259-020-05124-y; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00259-020-05124-y
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know