“Virtual” attenuation correction: improving stress myocardial perfusion SPECT imaging using deep learning
European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, ISSN: 1619-7089, Vol: 49, Issue: 9, Page: 3140-3149
2022
- 24Citations
- 19Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations24
- Citation Indexes24
- 24
- CrossRef1
- Captures19
- Readers19
- 19
Article Description
Purpose: Myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) using single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) is widely used for coronary artery disease (CAD) evaluation. Although attenuation correction is recommended to diminish image artifacts and improve diagnostic accuracy, approximately 3/4ths of clinical MPI worldwide remains non-attenuation-corrected (NAC). In this work, we propose a novel deep learning (DL) algorithm to provide “virtual” DL attenuation–corrected (DLAC) perfusion polar maps solely from NAC data without concurrent computed tomography (CT) imaging or additional scans. Methods: SPECT MPI studies (N = 11,532) with paired NAC and CTAC images were retrospectively identified. A convolutional neural network–based DL algorithm was developed and trained on half of the population to predict DLAC polar maps from NAC polar maps. Total perfusion deficit (TPD) was evaluated for all polar maps. TPDs from NAC and DLAC polar maps were compared to CTAC TPDs in linear regression analysis. Moreover, receiver-operating characteristic analysis was performed on NAC, CTAC, and DLAC TPDs to predict obstructive CAD as diagnosed from invasive coronary angiography. Results: DLAC TPDs exhibited significantly improved linear correlation (p < 0.001) with CTAC (R = 0.85) compared to NAC vs. CTAC (R = 0.68). The diagnostic performance of TPD was also improved with DLAC compared to NAC with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.827 vs. 0.780 (p = 0.012) with no statistically significant difference between AUC for CTAC and DLAC. At 88% sensitivity, specificity was improved by 18.9% for DLAC and 25.6% for CTAC. Conclusions: The proposed DL algorithm provided attenuation correction comparable to CTAC without the need for additional scans. Compared to conventional NAC perfusion imaging, DLAC significantly improved diagnostic accuracy.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85126768906&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00259-022-05735-7; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35312837; https://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00259-022-05735-7; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00259-022-05735-7; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00259-022-05735-7
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know